Hi Gustavo, > >> I think new projects from 2010 should not have ipv4-only. This time > >> should be over, finally. And people should get used to see ipv6 > >> everywhere, and we should try to break the chicken-egg thing wherever > >> possible. :) > >> > >> I can see the use for a systemd without any IP networking, but > >> compiling-out ipv6 seems like the wrong thing to me. Sure, we should > >> make sure, that systemd handles a kernel without ipv6 gracefully, but > >> not offer a switch to stay in the IP stone age. :) > > > > That means I'll have to maintain this patch outside tree forever? :-) > > btw, if you allow my patch to get in, in consideration I will kindly > create a new patch that flags if ipv6 support is present and if not > fallback to my ipv4 code... but that also means we need review of my > provided ipv4 code ;-)
this is the wrong approach. I agree with Kay here in that systemd needs to handle gracefully a kernel where IPv6 is disabled, but that should be all that it is doing. Regards Marcel _______________________________________________ systemd-devel mailing list systemd-devel@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel