On Sat, 25.12.10 16:35, Tollef Fog Heen (tfh...@err.no) wrote: > | I see little reason to deviate in this regard between distributions > | and hence I'd very much appreciate if a) Debian would adopt the same > | terminfo package as everybody else or b) we find an equally suitable > | default TERM value that is known on both Debian and everything else. > > What's wrong with just using vt100? AIUI, vt100-nav is the same, just > with less «advanced» video capabilities. The terminfo entry is: > > vt100-nav|vt100 without advanced video option, > xmc#1, > blink@, bold@, rev@, rmso=\E[m, rmul@, sgr@, sgr0@, smso=\E[7m, > smul@, use=vt100, > > so, no blink, no bold, no reverse video, standout is reverse video > (which looks odd, if it doesn't support reverse video), no underline, no > attribute modes, but otherwise a vt100.
Hmm, interesting. If this is the case it might indeed be an option to switch to v100 by default. Bill, do you remember why vt100-nav has been used on Fedora for this? Would you oppose if we switch the default to vt100 everywhere? Lennart -- Lennart Poettering - Red Hat, Inc. _______________________________________________ systemd-devel mailing list systemd-devel@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel