On Tue, 18.01.11 16:41, Alexander E. Patrakov (patra...@gmail.com) wrote: > >How is this implemented in detail? Sending SIGINT is async, so at the > >time you start the new instance you cannot be sure that the old instance > >has stopped listening? > > Indeed, there is a race here. That's why "/bin/sleep 1" in my > initial service file.
Hmm, what's the lighthttp people's take on this? They came up with the scheme, so how do they think this problem should be handled? (One possible solution could be if the old and the new instance would communicate and pass the listening sockets via some AF_UNIX socket/SCM_RIGHTS or so. But that is not trivial.) "Solutions" such as sleep 1 are not really how we do things in systemd land... Lennart -- Lennart Poettering - Red Hat, Inc. _______________________________________________ systemd-devel mailing list systemd-devel@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel
