On Thu, 17.03.11 09:52, Andrey Borzenkov (arvidj...@mail.ru) wrote: > > I understand that there's already a looong TODO, but maybe it's possible > > to cram such systemctl view option(s) somewhere in that list? > > > > I was vaguely thinking about adding generic selection option to > replace current ad-hoc ones, something like > > --state=enabled,!exited
! on the sell is always a bit weird. But this might be a good idea to have. > or even allowing generic filtering on specific property, like > > --query Type=socket,dbus Hmm, having this would make systemctl almost an SQL database ;-) I think we should try to figure out what exactly we need, instead of losing ourselves in inventing new matching languages. systemctl already has quite a long man page, and I'd prefer if it wouldnt become a novel. Maybe one option would be to introduce it as seperate 'systemd-query' tool or so? Lennart -- Lennart Poettering - Red Hat, Inc. _______________________________________________ systemd-devel mailing list systemd-devel@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel
