Well, your email suprises me, really. Yes I read some sort of apologies, but he is expecting someone is dissapointed he's not reacting. If that's not arrogant, I'm a marsian.
I will raise a fund to support all of those who are dissapointed by him not reacting... Yek Much better would be just: I cannot react right now, but this issue has my interest. I expect to react later.. In communication it's very important to treat each other with respect. As soccertrainer (and maybe soon teacher mathematics) I really think that's important when working together. Stef Bon 2011/4/19 Michal Schmidt <mschm...@redhat.com>: > On 04/18/2011 11:04 PM, Stef Bon wrote: >> >> 2011/1/17 Lennart Poettering<mz...@0pointer.de>: >>> >>> possible is via xattr support in procfs and cgroupfs. >>> >>> Anyway, as mentioned, I am not really ready to discuss this now. Sorry >>> of that might sound disappointing. >>> >> >> Why do think anyone is disappointed, by you not reacting? Do you >> really think that???? > > Since the original message called for some cooperation with systemd and > systemd-devel was CC'd, it was only logical to assume that a response from > the systemd developer was expected. > >> I'snt it a bit arrogant to think this? >> >> In my opinion people are can be disappointed by the way we are treated >> by another, not by what we do or don't. >> >> I've been called arrogant before, but you are really king here! >> >> Hale king Lennart! > > Lennart's response consisted of 4 informative paragraphs and a closing > apology for not being yet more helpful. > In what universe is this considered arrogant? > > Michal > _______________________________________________ systemd-devel mailing list systemd-devel@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel