2011/4/21 David Daney <dda...@caviumnetworks.com>: > On 04/20/2011 11:09 AM, Lennart Poettering wrote: >> >> On Wed, 20.04.11 10:36, David Daney (dda...@caviumnetworks.com) wrote: >> >>> You would have to do something like this (untested): >>> >>> int foo_fanotify_mark(int fanotify_fd, unsigned int flags, u64 mask, >>> int dfd, const char __user * pathname) >>> { >>> u32 mask_low = (u32)mask; >>> u32 mask_high = (u32)(mask>> 32); >>> >>> return syscall(4337, fanotify_fd, flags, mask_low, mask_high, dfd, >>> pathname); >>> >>> } >>> >>> The order of mask_low, mask_high in the syscall argument list >>> depends on the endianness. Figuring out the correct order is left >>> as an exercise for the reader. >> >> That's basically the same patch as this one, right? >> >> >> http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/systemd-devel/attachments/20110420/be2d393b/attachment.obj >> > > It looks like it might do the same thing. Someone should try it on an o32 > MIPS userland running on a mips64 kernel. I tested it on o32 userland + n64 kernel. The patch works.
-- Regards, - cee1 _______________________________________________ systemd-devel mailing list systemd-devel@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel