On Mon, 27.06.11 16:19, Sérgio Basto (ser...@serjux.com) wrote: heya,
> On Tue, 2011-06-21 at 18:37 +0200, Lennart Poettering wrote: > > On Tue, 21.06.11 17:24, Sérgio Basto (ser...@serjux.com) wrote: > > > > > > > > On Tue, 2011-06-21 at 12:35 +0200, Lennart Poettering wrote: > > > > These units are *not* installed locally, > > > but I want install it , how I do know what should install ? > > > > But why would you want that? > > why I want install services that depend on others service ? , to put > computer work correctly . Again, this has nothing to do with whether your machine works correctly. This is used primarily to order services in a very weak way: if both services exist order them against each other, if not, then don't. So really, there is nothing to fix. To make that clear we hide the services unless you pass --all. Let me emphasize this: This is no breakage here, and there is nothing to fix. > > (If you really do, you can always do something like "yum install > > /usr/lib/systemd/system/foobar.service" and yum will do the right thing, > > but again, that's really unnecessary.) > > /lib/systemd/system/hal.service, doesn't exist in fedora repos Some LSB init script properly misspelled "hald" as "hal". Lennart -- Lennart Poettering - Red Hat, Inc. _______________________________________________ systemd-devel mailing list systemd-devel@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel