On Tue, 5 Jul 2011 21:21:03 +0200 Lennart Poettering wrote: > This is information that should not be encoded in the packages, but > in some external database. And this is what "presets" are supposed to > be.
Hooray, this will solve bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=630174 > - systemd would not ship any preset file by default (and probably not > even the directory), this is left to distributions. Most likely the > distributions would ship a preset file in some spin-specific RPM, > which would conflict with the the RPMs for other spins. If I understand this correctly, in Fedora there could be packages server-preset, desktop-preset, kde-preset, ... all with "Provides: systemd-preset". And the systemd-units package (or the systemd package itself if/when they get merged) will have "Requires: systemd-preset" to ensure a spin's preset file is installed before the services. Michal _______________________________________________ systemd-devel mailing list systemd-devel@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel
