On 8/2/11 1:02 AM, Lennart Poettering wrote:
On Thu, 28.07.11 15:20, warpme (war...@o2.pl) wrote:Zbyszek, Thx for replay. You touch exactly the point.You can use more than one ExecStartPost. E.g. ExecStartPost=sleep 10 ExecStartPost=systemctl try-restart proc2 This way you remove the unnecessary delay when starting proc2.This is exactly way how I want to implement this. Issue is that in systemd-29 it seems to impossible to successfully call systemctl from unit files. Processing of such unit simply hangs. I get impression systemctl can't be called recurrently.It can. We do that by default in rsyslog.service for example. But you need to make sure not to add deadlocks with that, or only trigger but not synchonously wait for your operations. Use systemctl --no-block for that. Lennart
Lennart, Thx You find time to replay to my e-mail. I REALLY like systemd concept. Usage of cgroups was plainly perfect move. This is one form most elegant subsystems I found in Linux ! It is great You are contributing to Linux.Having chance to talk with You and having access to Your experience: I'm curious Your opinion what distro You will advice me if I want to have highest stability but also high freshness in components (kernel & mysql is key). I'm asking as I have very unusual issue related to client side of mysql and after trying various tweaks, kernels & mysql I'm out of ideas :-(
-br
<<attachment: warpme.vcf>>
_______________________________________________ systemd-devel mailing list systemd-devel@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel
