On Mon, 22.08.11 16:15, Stef Bon (stef...@gmail.com) wrote: > Why the combination MS_BIND | MS_MOVE here?? > A move is a little bit confucing, since a move of the root, while the > subirectories are already mounted. > It looks more a bit to make the new namespace consistent or something like > that. > > Can someone explain this?
Basically you have to specifiy MS_BIND for all calls where you want to change the bind mount, not the superblock. Lennart -- Lennart Poettering - Red Hat, Inc. _______________________________________________ systemd-devel mailing list systemd-devel@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel
