On Tue, 11.10.11 01:36, Kay Sievers (kay.siev...@vrfy.org) wrote: > > On Tue, Oct 11, 2011 at 01:17, Lennart Poettering > <lenn...@poettering.net> wrote: > > On Sun, 02.10.11 20:07, Koen Kooi (k...@dominion.thruhere.net) wrote: > > > >> Make would choke on missing rules for man/systemd.1 > > > > Hmm, I think this is a misunderstanding: > > > > The original idea here was to require xsltproc when you build from git, > > but ship the pre-generated man pages in the tarball so that you don't > > need xsltproc when you build from a tarball. configure is a script that > > only works properly for the tarball case, and generally is not suitable > > for finding dependencies necessary for git builds. (i.e. it won't > > install autoconf/automake either, ust assumes they are there.) > > > > Or am I missing something here? > > No, discussed that already on IRC already. I don't think we can do > that with current autotools. It would be nice though to support direct > builds from git, but I think it needs more than conditionals. > > One option here would be to introduce a --disable-docs option. > > The other option, obviously, is to fix xsltproc, wait for it to be > fixed, to do the right thing, which was the plan last time I talked to > Koen. :)
Fix xsltproc? Hmm? What do you mean? What should it to differently? I mean, if it isn't installed it can't do anything differently, can it? Lennart -- Lennart Poettering - Red Hat, Inc. _______________________________________________ systemd-devel mailing list systemd-devel@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel
