On Tue, Mar 27, 2012 at 12:01:36PM +0200, Lennart Poettering wrote: > On Mon, 26.03.12 21:25, Marti Raudsepp (ma...@juffo.org) wrote: > > > > > On Mon, Mar 26, 2012 at 21:07, Lennart Poettering > > <lenn...@poettering.net> wrote: > > > Marti, sorry for changing my mind on this: would be great if you could > > > prep a patch for this for systemd itself. > > > > D'oh, I already prepared a patch for kexec, although I haven't sent it > > out yet. > > OK, I am fine with either.
FWIW, I think systemd is a better place for this change. > > > Hmm, so since this would then belong in the shutdown path of systemd, > > > and only be added for the kexec shutdown path I actually think it would > > > make more sense to add this into systemd itself instead of kexec-tools, > > > to ensure the right ordering. > > > > Um, why is including in systemd necessary for guaranteeing order? > > It isn't, but it's easier to keep early boot and late shutdown stuff in > systemd. > > Lennart > > -- > Lennart Poettering - Red Hat, Inc. > _______________________________________________ systemd-devel mailing list systemd-devel@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel
