On Fri, Jun 15, 2012 at 7:37 AM, Kok, Auke-jan H
<auke-jan.h....@intel.com> wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 15, 2012 at 4:24 AM, Ciprian Dorin Craciun
> <ciprian.crac...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> I think you really don't want to try and run a systemd --user (highly
>>> experimental!) without a systemd --system (stable), that would be the
>>> world upside down, and you're going to get every little part of it
>>> wrong.
>>
>> I think I'll give it a rest for a while until the `--user` gets more
>> stable.
>
> it's stable, but, you're trying to make use of it while it's currently
> building
> heavily on assumptions that your system cannot provide, and, you're
> not providing
> an appropriate replacement to meet those expectations.
I completely agree that I try to use it in an "special" way
without having met all the requirements, that `systemd --system`
gracefully provides.
Unfortunately I have no choice, as none of these requirements are
not documented... In the `systemctl` or `systemd` man-page there is no
single word about any D-BUS related configurations.
P.S.: To be clearer on my intentions, I try to identify if systemd
is a good candidate as a process manager for an application composed
of multiple daemons. Thus when I deliver the application, I want to
also deliver it with an "embedded" systemd, and not force the client
to migrate to systemd.
_______________________________________________
systemd-devel mailing list
systemd-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel
