Am 28.06.2012 06:04, schrieb Mathieu Bridon: > On Thu, 2012-06-28 at 04:02 +0200, Reindl Harald wrote: >> Am 28.06.2012 02:21, schrieb Tom Lane: >>> Lennart Poettering <lenn...@poettering.net> writes: >>>> On Wed, 27.06.12 14:50, Honza Horak (hho...@redhat.com) wrote: >>>>> One of the issue is (in)ability to imitate the original behavior of >>>>> mysqld_safe, which restarts the main process only if it crashes and >>>>> the pid file isn't properly cleaned up. >>> >>>> I am pretty sure "on-abort" is actually what you really want here, no? >>>> The PID file checking sounds like a hack to achieve the same? >>> >>> every production installation of mysql in the world >>> runs underneath mysqld_safe, and has done for the last ten years or >>> more >> >> yes because maintainers like you are not proceeding > > Maintainers like him are giving the rest of us (including you) something > really good [1] for free, while your only involvement seems to be > limited to ranting and insulting people on various mailing lists.
sorry, but in the case of mysqld i had to waste some days and night to and iy you do not understand what i mean look here: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=714426#c40 sad to say but Tom's mysqld package was completly broken over many months for F15 because he ignroed systemd at all and most comments in bugreports were what he not will do
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ systemd-devel mailing list systemd-devel@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel
