On Mon, Sep 24, 2012 at 2:32 PM, Lennart Poettering <lenn...@poettering.net> wrote: > On Mon, 24.09.12 12:22, Ali Lown (a...@lown.me.uk) wrote:
>> /dev/md0p1: >> P: /devices/virtual/block/md0/md0p1 >> E: DEVTYPE=partition >> E: SUBSYSTEM=block >> E: SYSTEMD_READY=0 >> E: TAGS=:systemd: >> /dev/md0p5 and /dev/md0p6 also report SYSTEMD_READY=0 >> >> So, the tag isn't being set correctly? > > The tag is there correctly (i.e. as you ca see in the TAGS= field, which > includes systemd for both cases). > > My edcuated guess is that this is a result of you having a partition > table on top of md, which causes the md rules in 99-systemd.rules not > have ay effect on the partition block devices. Not sure, if that's the whole story: http://cgit.freedesktop.org/systemd/systemd/commit/?id=d2fff1ced447c09c6601a6617300467ccd81660b The current rules always marked all MD partitions as inactive, which does not sound right. We are not even sure if the partitions would ever get a change event later. Please try if that makes things better, as said, there might be more needed than that. Thanks, Kay _______________________________________________ systemd-devel mailing list systemd-devel@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel