Am 07.10.2012 06:56, schrieb Kok, Auke-jan H:
>> All my patch does is match systemd's behaviour to systemctl's behaviour.
>> It is about being consistent. It is about not claiming that things work
>> which actually don't work.
> 
> now you're saying that systemd actually works (to a certain point,
> sure), but systemctl is broken? Now I'm really confused...

For systemctl, I could definitely find out why it wouldn't work.

I couldn't test systemd as there was no convenient way to start services
due to a lack of systemctl. There was something wrong inside systemd as
well, witnessed by its inability to exit with 'kill -15' or Ctrl+C. I
gave up at this point, because the most basic functionality I was used
to was non-functional.


Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

_______________________________________________
systemd-devel mailing list
systemd-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel

Reply via email to