On Sat, 19.01.13 00:03, Ian Pilcher (arequip...@gmail.com) wrote: > Is there any way to create something like an "instantiated socket"?
Nope, there isn't. We currently do not allow this because we don't really know what to the per-connection service instances would be called like. i.e. if the socket is called foo@bar.socket, and it is activated, do you just drop the "bar" and activate foo@3-172.16.1.1-555-47.11.8.15-777.service? This would not cover your use case. So, the question is what to do instead. Lennart -- Lennart Poettering - Red Hat, Inc. _______________________________________________ systemd-devel mailing list systemd-devel@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel
