Le jeudi 28 février 2013 à 15:55 +0000, Colin Guthrie a écrit : > 'Twas brillig, and Lennart Poettering at 28/02/13 12:37 did gyre and gimble: > > On Wed, 27.02.13 22:22, Cristian Rodríguez (crrodrig...@opensuse.org) wrote: > > > >> Hi: > >> > >> There is buggy, legacy software around which simply does not behave > >> properly when faced with resume/suspend/hibernate which is not > >> always practical to modify or fix. > >> > >> Is there any way to have something like > >> > >> ReloadOnResume=[true|false] > >> StopOnSuspend=[true|false] > >> > >> Or some other mechanism provided by systemd/logind that does not > >> require to use the ugly /usr/lib/systemd/system-sleep/ hooks ? > > > > My recommendation would be to fix the software in question. I mean, we > > will provide compatibility with older software, but we are very > > conservative on adding hacky work-arounds for broken software, > > especially if no such hack existed in the solutions that were used > > before systemd. > > FWIW, while I'm in total agreement with what you say and the resolution, > the pm-utils hooks are what was used before systemd so there technical > was such a hack that existed in the solutions that were used before systemd. > > I remember seeing various hooks here to e.g. shut down mysql and restart > it again and such like things. That particular example hasn't been > needed for me for ages, but I'm sure there are other examples that might > be more legitimate. > > That said, I think Fred had patches that are applied in Suse to read > these pm-utils hooks anyway, so that might be what Cristian needs?
Well, the patch in question is even more ugly than that, since it defers to pm-utils (when available) suspend / hibernate ;( -- Frederic Crozat <fcro...@suse.com> SUSE _______________________________________________ systemd-devel mailing list systemd-devel@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel