Op 12 apr. 2013, om 18:24 heeft Robert Schweikert <rjsch...@suse.com> het volgende geschreven:
> Thanks Kay for pointing me in the right direction > > > From fced3673ee1001dc905206f9a92ea2062f951d3c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 > From: Robert Schweikert <rjsch...@suse.com> > Date: Fri, 12 Apr 2013 12:08:16 -0400 > Subject: [PATCH] rules: add lid switch of ARM based Chromebook as a power > switch to logind > > --- > src/login/70-power-switch.rules | 1 + > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) > > diff --git a/src/login/70-power-switch.rules b/src/login/70-power-switch.rules > index 36fb827..d925ab7 100644 > --- a/src/login/70-power-switch.rules > +++ b/src/login/70-power-switch.rules > @@ -9,5 +9,6 @@ ACTION=="remove", GOTO="power_switch_end" > > SUBSYSTEM=="input", KERNEL=="event*", SUBSYSTEMS=="acpi", TAG+="power-switch" > SUBSYSTEM=="input", KERNEL=="event*", KERNELS=="thinkpad_acpi", > TAG+="power-switch" > +SUBSYSTEM=="input", KERNEL=="event*", KERNELS=="gpio-keys.8", > TAG+="power-switch" Won't that trigger on every gpio-keys entry that devicetree labels as 8? I don't think it's a lid switch for all boards with gpio-keys.8 out there and even if it was, the .8 is just as stable as ethX, you shouldn't depend on it. regards, Koen _______________________________________________ systemd-devel mailing list systemd-devel@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel
