Hi Lennart, Thanks for your feedback.
Lennart Poettering <lenn...@poettering.net> writes: > If Debian is interested in making systemd minimal, they could split out > logind and loginctl, since that is something you need that only for > systems where users or admins log into. For embedded devices it's > totally optional. Noted. > It might be interesting to mention which of the libraries systemd > depends on are actually in Debian's "essential" and "required" > priorities, and hence are nothing that systemd would pull in but > something that one cannot install Debian without anyway. For example, > libpam, libselinux, libattr all are afair. I touched on this in the accompanying blog post, see below: For the record, the dependency list and first blog post of the series are published by now, find them at: http://people.debian.org/~stapelberg/2013/06/09/systemd-bloat.html http://people.debian.org/~stapelberg/docs/systemd-dependencies.html > systemd-shutdown is not statically linked. Fixed. > The readahead, bootchart, nspawn, activate, analyze, cgls/gtop stuff is > something debian could still split off, btw, if they really wanted to > (not that I would recommend that, but well...). Noted. -- Best regards, Michael _______________________________________________ systemd-devel mailing list systemd-devel@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel