On Tue, Jul 16, 2013 at 05:46:04PM +0200, Lennart Poettering wrote:
> On Tue, 16.07.13 17:42, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek (zbys...@in.waw.pl) wrote:
>
> >
> > On Tue, Jul 16, 2013 at 05:39:54PM +0200, Lennart Poettering wrote:
> > > On Fri, 28.06.13 17:26, Jan Janssen (medhe...@web.de) wrote:
> > > Applied this one now. If people start complaining about its speed we can
> > > reinvestigate and do find some way for optimization...
> > We need to think about negative matches. Looking for previous boots
> > with negative matches should work nicely.
>
> The bisection tables make this less efficient but certainly possible.
>
> > I'd like to complain about the : in the syntax though.
>
> Hmm, what would you propose? There's still time to fix it!
I went ahead, and removed : from the syntax. It feels OK in my testing.
And I also made one optimization, which is important imho: 'journactl -b'
will still use the boot id from sd_id128_get_boot() to avoid searching
through the tables, and 'journalctl -b BOOT_ID[+-0]' will just
use BOOT_ID without searching through the tables. This should help
a lot when running with cold cache.
Zbyszek
--
they are not broken. they are refucktored
-- alxchk
_______________________________________________
systemd-devel mailing list
systemd-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel
