On Sat, Jul 20, 2013 at 08:37:14AM +0200, Holger Hans Peter Freyther wrote: > On Sat, Jul 20, 2013 at 01:09:35AM +0200, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: > > Hi, > > > > Applied for now. > > > I picked %MAKEFILE% as this is what was in the generated Makefile before > my patch. I just tried to match the output. Originally: .PRECIOUS: Makefile After 1st patch: .PRECIOUS: $(TEST_SUITE_LOG) With 2nd patch: .PRECIOUS: $(TEST_SUITE_LOG) %MAKEFILE% With 2nd patch modified: .PRECIOUS: $(TEST_SUITE_LOG) Makefile
... that's at least how it looks in my testing. I don't think that having %MAKEFILE% in the final Makefile makes any sense, and it swhould always be "Makefile". Maybe automake forgets to substitute it in your case, or something eelse is hapenning. > > > But that looks like a plain automake bug. It should know that targets > > starting with a dot are not real targets. Could you file a bug > > report with automake, so this gets fixed properly? > > I sent an email to the automake list and will report back. Thanks. Zbyszek -- they are not broken. they are refucktored -- alxchk _______________________________________________ systemd-devel mailing list systemd-devel@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel