On Sat, Jul 20, 2013 at 6:16 PM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek <zbys...@in.waw.pl> wrote: >> What uml does here sound really weird, and vconsole should just >> silently give up when it finds such a messed up setup. :)
> Sure, or we can add a one line check in the unit file. That what > we have those Conditions for :) I'm +1 on the patch. I don't think so. Conditions are to optimize for well-defined behaviour, not to work around specific and exotic setups which implement broken devices. We should not start collecting all future weird setups in our primary unit files, it's not how things should work, such work-arounds need to be a generic as possible. Kay _______________________________________________ systemd-devel mailing list systemd-devel@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel
