On Sun, 21.07.13 06:36, Jan Engelhardt (jeng...@inai.de) wrote: > > On Saturday 2013-07-20 02:05, Pablo Nehab Hess wrote: > > >Hi all, > > > >I was wondering how much systemd could add to current high > >availability cluster setups. > >[...] > >Does this idea even make sense? Is it too "one systemd to rule them all"? > > If it means we can principally get rid of the OCF scripts (they are as > ugly as sysvinit scripts). However, as always, the "systemd is going to > be even fatter" argument might come up again if it enlarges > /usr/lib/systemd/systemd.
Could you elaborate on what "OCF scripts" precisely are and do? Lennart -- Lennart Poettering - Red Hat, Inc. _______________________________________________ systemd-devel mailing list systemd-devel@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel
