On Thu, Oct 10, 2013 at 11:21 AM, Olivier Brunel <j...@jjacky.com> wrote:
> No, I believe that was the point of the patch. The two tests were the > same, first testing (x < y), and then (y > x). Now it then properly > tests for (x > y) > Totally didn't read the context of the code, just the changes and the patch comment. Sorry about that :-/
_______________________________________________ systemd-devel mailing list systemd-devel@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel
