On Tue, Oct 15, 2013 at 2:58 AM, David Strauss <da...@davidstrauss.net> wrote: > On Mon, Oct 14, 2013 at 5:53 PM, Kay Sievers <k...@vrfy.org> wrote: >> Please give it a name a human can parse and pronounce. :) > > sa-bridge? act-bridge? other suggestions?
We really should avoid non-obvious or not commonly used abbreviations. Neither s nor a are anywhere obvious here. Also this thing does not actually *activate* anything it just proxies. And long-running processes should get a d(aemon) at the end. So why not just call it systemd-socket-proxyd. > I named it in the spirit of cgtop, systemctl, etc., none of which use > delimiters. cg is pretty well known, there is even a libcg. Also command line tools, can be argued, are nice to have shorter, the proxy just shows up in ps, and should identify itself without needlessy cryptic names. Thanks, Kay _______________________________________________ systemd-devel mailing list systemd-devel@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel
