On Tue, Oct 29, 2013 at 6:45 PM, Umut Tezduyar <u...@tezduyar.com> wrote:
>> The global mirroring across trees makes no sense in the future. The >> several independent trees will go away in the kernel next year, and >> then systemd would not know what to do with an instruction like >> DefaultControllers. > > I don't disagree that mirroring will not make sense in the future. > Though, without global mirroring on cpuacct I don't understand how > systemd-cgtop is expected to give cpu accounting information of > individual services. Also without global mirroring on cpu control > group, how would CPUShares=weight even work on any service. I am just > confused. The kernel will only have one single hierarchy, all properties will be located in this single tree. Cgtop just reads the stuff from the controller *attributes* there, instead of finding them in a separate controller *tree*. Kay _______________________________________________ systemd-devel mailing list systemd-devel@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel
