On Sun, Nov 03, 2013 at 06:18:39PM +0000, Hoyer, Marko (ADITG/SW2) wrote: > Thx for the fast feedback. Good hint with the man page, I'll have a more > detailed look on the page. I think when you need to stay a bit independent > from systemd and don't have a dbus interface which can be used for > synchronization there is probably no other way then the classical one. > > But in case I'm starting in such a well prepared environment like the one > provided by a systemd service, I hopefully will not run into any troubles > even if my daemon is "missing something of the required initialization > sequence or doing it wrong" ;)
Actually, the opposite is true. Systemd is more demanding, primarily because everything is faster, and if there's a race condition during daemon startup, it's more likely to matter with systemd. So, having a "well prepared environment" doesn't mean the startup procedure can be sloppy. Zbyszek _______________________________________________ systemd-devel mailing list systemd-devel@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel
