This was introduced in e1770af812 (2012-02-03, swap: replace failure
boolean by result enum).
It doesn't do any harm as it most likely will get optimized away anyway,
but maybe for readability?
---
src/core/swap.c | 5 +----
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/src/core/swap.c b/src/core/swap.c
index e0627db..6b204df 100644
--- a/src/core/swap.c
+++ b/src/core/swap.c
@@ -999,10 +999,7 @@ static void swap_sigchld_event(Unit *u, pid_t pid, int
code, int status) {
case SWAP_DEACTIVATING_SIGKILL:
case SWAP_DEACTIVATING_SIGTERM:
- if (f == SWAP_SUCCESS)
- swap_enter_dead(s, f);
- else
- swap_enter_dead(s, f);
+ swap_enter_dead(s, f);
break;
default:
--
1.8.5.2.227.g53f3478
_______________________________________________
systemd-devel mailing list
systemd-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel
