On Fri, Jan 03, 2014 at 05:58:46PM +0100, Michael Scherer wrote: > Le vendredi 03 janvier 2014 à 17:22 +0100, m...@zarb.org a écrit : > > As discussed on the SELinux thread, this patch attempt to offer the same > > level of configuration for Apparmor distributions by permitting to the > > sysadmin to set the profile used by a unit. I didn't tested it but would > > like to get early feedback on it from openSUSE and Ubuntu users, as they > > are the 2 main set of users of AppArmor. > > > > Main inspiration come from the upstart support, on > > https://code.launchpad.net/~mdeslaur/upstart/apparmor-support > > However, we are currently lacking the capacity of using directly a on disk > > profile, and > > I am not sure on the best way to support that. > > I have also been told on irc that Michael Stapelberg wrote the same kind > of patch ( if not the same, given there isn't much possible variation ), > cf https://lists.debian.org/debian-security/2014/01/msg00008.html
Your patch looks fine. I sent a comment on the patch 1/2 in the other mail. Even though it's very simple it would be great if you could test it after proposed changes. If nobody objects, I'd merge this in a few days. Zbyszek _______________________________________________ systemd-devel mailing list systemd-devel@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel
