Hey folks, I'm using better-initramfs [1], a very small and minimal initrd that has been working very well for me. In switching to systemd, I found it necessary to have the initrd mount "/run" as tmpfs, according to the specs [2]. I made a little patch for better-initramfs, and now I'm talking to the maintainer about merging that.
But really... I don't want to do this. Why is systemd itself not capable of setting up /run? Why does the initrd need to do it? My experience booting without /run is that systemd then fails to start completely. Is this what's supposed to happen? What's going on? Preferably, I don't desire to place any additional systemd-specific burden on better-initramfs. Thanks, Jason [1] https://github.com/slashbeast/better-initramfs [2] http://www.freedesktop.org/wiki/Software/systemd/InitrdInterface/ _______________________________________________ systemd-devel mailing list systemd-devel@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel
