On 26/03/14 03:38, Kay Sievers wrote: > On Mon, Mar 17, 2014 at 1:43 AM, Lennart Poettering > <lenn...@poettering.net> wrote: >> On Sun, 16.03.14 19:49, Samuli Suominen (ssuomi...@gentoo.org) wrote: >> >>> On 16/03/14 15:52, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: >>>> On Sun, Mar 16, 2014 at 10:10:15AM +0200, Samuli Suominen wrote: >>>>> Since -Wl,-fuse-ld=gold addition, this happens on IA64 arch where >>>>> binutils's ld gold doesn't support --gc-sections yet: >>>> Maybe you should just use bfd linker then? Gold was only necessary for the >>>> ifunc stuff, which is gone anyway. This might to be a better solution, >>>> since >>>> otherwise everything gets an extra lib. >>> -lresolv is used elsewhere in Makefile.am too, like in >>> libsystemd_la_LIBADD and test_resolve_LDADD >>> >>> src/libsystemd/sd-resolve/sd-resolve.c: ret = >>> res_search at line 432 >>> src/libsystemd/sd-resolve/sd-resolve.c: ret = >>> res_query at line 430 >>> >>> then sd-resolve.c is in libsystemd_internal_la_SOURCES, so adding >>> -lresolv to libsystemd_internal_la_LIBADD is not a workaround, >>> but the correct thing to do >> We probably should much rather create a separate internal convenience >> lib for sd-resolve so that the -lresolv dep isn't pulled into everything >> that uses any API of sd-id128, sd-login, sd-bus, ... > A workaround should be in the current release. > > Kay
I was worried about this one. Thanks! It's really appericiated! - Samuli _______________________________________________ systemd-devel mailing list systemd-devel@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel
