On Sat, Apr 5, 2014 at 11:39 AM, Samuli Suominen <ssuomi...@gentoo.org> wrote: > On 05/04/14 12:26, Tom Gundersen wrote: >> matching file will be applied. The 'masking' logic that you know from >> unit files does not really make much sense for .network files (but >> maybe this is something we should change...). Symlinks to /dev/null >> are just treated as empty .network files, so their meaning is "no >> [Match] section", which matches everything and "no [Network] section", >> which does nothing. I suppose this may be used to express "ignore any >> subsequent .network files", but I doubt that is a particularly useful >> thing to do. > > I know you are talking about .network files, but can I get verify on... > > You can still override /lib/systemd/network/99-default.link by > symlinking /etc/systemd/network/99-default.link to /dev/null, right?
Hm, yes. But the same logic applies, any subsequent .link files would also be masked (but such subsequent .link files would never have applied in the first place as 99-default.link matches everything. Cheers, Tom _______________________________________________ systemd-devel mailing list systemd-devel@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel