On Wed, 09.04.14 11:21, Tom Gundersen (t...@jklm.no) wrote: > > On Mon, Mar 31, 2014 at 8:28 PM, Mike Gilbert <flop...@gentoo.org> wrote: > > Several units now utilize the PrivateNetwork parameter, which requires > > network namespace support.
BTW, this really sounds like something where we should have graceful degradation: if network namespaces are missing we should probably simply ignore PrivateNetwork= (maybe print a one-time warning to syslog, just to mentioned this), and proceed without them. After all this is a feature that just takes away features, and doesn't add any, thus simply ignoring it should be safe. I'd be happy to merge a patch which implements such a scheme to support kernels with a more limited feature set. Lennart -- Lennart Poettering, Red Hat _______________________________________________ systemd-devel mailing list systemd-devel@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel
