В Fri, 20 Jun 2014 18:38:27 +0200 Lennart Poettering <lenn...@poettering.net> пишет:
> On Fri, 13.06.14 16:41, Werner Fink (wer...@suse.de) wrote: > > > From: arvidj...@gmail.com > > > > will terminate emergency.service due to implicit dependencies on > > basic.target > > and therefore sysinit.target which in turn conflict with > > emergency.target. > > I am not entirely sure how emergecny.service should have been reached > with syslog.socket in place? isolate should not have left it around? > commit 80cfe9e163b1c92f917e0a5e053b148fca790677 Author: Dr. Tilmann Bubeck <t.bub...@reinform.de> Date: Fri May 4 10:32:47 2012 +0200 Do no isolate in case of emergency or severe problems > > > > --- > > units/emergency.service.in | 2 +- > > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > > > diff --git units/emergency.service.in units/emergency.service.in > > index 94c090f..59f7cda 100644 > > --- units/emergency.service.in > > +++ units/emergency.service.in > > @@ -9,7 +9,7 @@ > > Description=Emergency Shell > > Documentation=man:sulogin(8) > > DefaultDependencies=no > > -Conflicts=shutdown.target > > +Conflicts=shutdown.target syslog.socket > > Before=shutdown.target > > > > [Service] > > > Lennart > _______________________________________________ systemd-devel mailing list systemd-devel@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel