On Fri, Jun 27, 2014 at 10:19:03PM +0100, Djalal Harouni wrote: > On Fri, Jun 27, 2014 at 12:23:05PM +0100, Djalal Harouni wrote: > > On Fri, Jun 27, 2014 at 01:04:00PM +0200, Daniel Mack wrote: > > > On 06/27/2014 12:51 PM, Djalal Harouni wrote: > > > > Just to let you know that I did notice a regression by ~70% when running > > > > test-kdbus-benchmark on a kvm guest (that's what I've under hands now) > > > > > > > > I know sorry, but still a kdbus on kvm is a valid case, I don't know if > > > > this affects real machine or only kvm guests will be able to confirm it > > > > next week unless someone do! > > > > > > > > If you are able to test it in a real machine and confirm that it affects > > > > them too, thank you! > > > > I've managed to bisect this to: > > > > 3.15.0-rc1 good > > > > 3.15.0-rc5 bad > > > > > > > > I Will continue later this day! > > > > > > Please do. I'm not currently aware of such a regression. What about > > > 3.16-rc2? > A bit late, sorry! > > I was wrong on the 3.15.0-rc5 sorry that was a fedora rawhide kernel got > confused by the naming and 'rc5'... but yes fedora rawhide affected! so > something backported perhaps... > > > Anyway for upstream tests: > > 3.15.0-rc5 and 3.15.0-rc7 are good > > 3.16-rc1 and 3.16-rc2 are bad > > So I confirm there is a regression somewhere.
Can you run 'git bisect' on the kernel tree to try to track down the problem commit? thanks, greg k-h _______________________________________________ systemd-devel mailing list systemd-devel@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel