On Tue, 08.07.14 19:59, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek (zbys...@in.waw.pl) wrote:
> > On Tue, Jul 08, 2014 at 02:53:22PM +0200, Thomas Blume wrote: > > -->-- > > In other words, PR/SM transforms physical resources into virtual resources > > so > > that many logical partitions can share the same physical resources. > > --<-- > > > > Still, from the OS point of view, the shared virtual resource is real > > hardware. > > So, I need to change the code and set ConditionVirtualization to false if > > the > > OS runs directly on PR/SM (e.g. in an LPAR). > > > > In this light, should we still use a common s390 _id string or would it make > > sense to keep the distinction between PR/SM and z/VM? > > PR/SM is the hypervisor, so it should be detected as *not* > virtualized, which mean that it does not get any _id string. For the > virtualized systems on top, yes, it'd be nice to be able to > distinguish them, iff there are clear and unamigous distinction > between virtualization approaches. So detecting one as "kvm" and the > other as z/something things sounds fine. I agree. Except for one thing: I'd prefer if we could keep the identifiers free of special chars. Hence "zsomethhing" rather than "z/something", please... Lennart -- Lennart Poettering, Red Hat _______________________________________________ systemd-devel mailing list systemd-devel@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel