'Twas brillig, and Colin Guthrie at 23/07/14 11:29 did gyre and gimble: > If there was a /usr/share/factory/etc/login.defs with e.g. 500 boundary > point, then this file would presumably be copied in by tmpfiles to > populate /etc/login.defs
Of course one thing that makes this argument slightly invalid is that if you DO have a /usr/share/factory/etc/login.defs, then this file *should* be configured with the same boundary as systemd's built in defaults, so there should be no problem in the context of bootstrapping /etc. Therefore, if this is the case, then the argument for not reading and honouring /etc/login.defs if it exists is, IMO, invalid. Have I won Lennart? Are you now convinced that such a patch would be in the same category as Zbigniew's sysusers reading /etc/sysusers.d/ patch that already went in? :p Col -- Colin Guthrie gmane(at)colin.guthr.ie http://colin.guthr.ie/ Day Job: Tribalogic Limited http://www.tribalogic.net/ Open Source: Mageia Contributor http://www.mageia.org/ PulseAudio Hacker http://www.pulseaudio.org/ Trac Hacker http://trac.edgewall.org/ _______________________________________________ systemd-devel mailing list systemd-devel@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel