El 18/09/14 a las #4, Emil Renner Berthing escribió:
---
src/shared/missing.h | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/src/shared/missing.h b/src/shared/missing.h
index b441149..8389c28 100644
--- a/src/shared/missing.h
+++ b/src/shared/missing.h
@@ -353,7 +353,7 @@ static inline int name_to_handle_at(int fd, const char
*name, struct file_handle
# ifdef HAVE___SECURE_GETENV
# define secure_getenv __secure_getenv
# else
-# error "neither secure_getenv nor __secure_getenv are available"
+# define secure_getenv getenv
# endif
#endif
No. this patch in particular (and maybe the whole sumbbision) is
unnaceptable..
Systemd is designed to work with glibc and only glibc is supported, be
comatible with it and there will be no need for any of this.
I suggest not to apply these series at all.
_______________________________________________
systemd-devel mailing list
systemd-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel
