Hi On Fri, Sep 19, 2014 at 10:56 PM, Emil Renner Berthing <syst...@esmil.dk> wrote: > On 19 September 2014 22:19, David Herrmann <dh.herrm...@gmail.com> wrote: >> On Fri, Sep 19, 2014 at 8:26 PM, Emil Renner Berthing <syst...@esmil.dk> >> wrote: >>> Don't rely on __WORDSIZE, but just standard LONG_MAX >>> and INT_MAX from limits.h. >> >> Why? The commit message lacks any explanation of that change. > > Ah, sorry. This is a better version of the [RFC 5/25] patch I sent earlier. > The point is that __WORDSIZE is not portable, but both > LONG_MAX and INT_MAX are mandated in limits.h. > > I can resend with this explanation in the commit message if you want.
I rewrote the commit-message and pushed the fix. Thanks David _______________________________________________ systemd-devel mailing list systemd-devel@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel
