>From Lennart Poettering, Thu 02 Oct 2014 at 16:07:03 (+0200) : > How precisely would you envision this to work? I mean, so far > "systemctl preset foo@bar.service" will precisely enable > "foo@bar.service"
That's exactly what I want; I have not tried systemctl preset foo@bar.service, but in 'systemctl preset-all' it does not work (it only enables services that exist, not instanciated service). > , but you are expecting that "systemctl preset > foo@.service" would somehow result in enablement of foo@bar.service or > so? How would we even denote that in the rules files? No, I just want that enable foo@bar.service in a preset rule works with systemctl preset-all. Maybe I missed something and it already works? Thanks, Damien Robert _______________________________________________ systemd-devel mailing list systemd-devel@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel
