On Wed, Oct 22, 2014 at 6:41 PM, Lennart Poettering <lenn...@poettering.net> wrote: > On Wed, 22.10.14 18:35, Umut Tezduyar Lindskog (u...@tezduyar.com) wrote: > >> > That's difficult to say just from these logs. Can you reliably >> > reproduce this? If so, can you attach strace to journald before this >> > happens and see what it is doing? >> >> I am wondering if we should send another signal that generates core >> when the watchdog is not fed. It would be nice to get the coredump of >> a frozen process. > > Oh indeed, we should probably send a SIGABRT in this case. Makes a ton > of sense. Love it! > > Added to the TODO list.
What makes sense here the most? Something like KillSignalWatchdog= or just by default sending SIGABRT on services that timed out? Umut > > Lennart > > -- > Lennart Poettering, Red Hat _______________________________________________ systemd-devel mailing list systemd-devel@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel