On Mon, 27.10.14 14:43, Kay Sievers (k...@vrfy.org) wrote: > On Mon, Oct 27, 2014 at 2:22 PM, Alexander Larsson <al...@redhat.com> wrote: > > On lör, 2014-10-25 at 13:45 +0200, Kay Sievers wrote: > >> > Kay, any ideas on the udev database stability? > >> > >> No stability. And so far no guarantees that things will not change. > >> > >> The versions of the udev daemon, libudev and the runtime data must > >> match. Any expectations about version mix and match would require a > >> promise we do not give at this moment. > >> > >> It might change with an imaginary "sd-device library", but it is very > >> unlikely to happen with the current udev. > > > > So, libudev will not be supportable as bundled in a sandboxed app then? > > Right. I don't think we can make any such promises with the current code base. > > The event monitor depends on a the same version of the running daemon, > or the properties which depend on the data in /run. Only the part that > finds devices, reads properties and enumerates /sys should be fine.
Maybe the right approach is to move things over to kdbus, and then make sandboxed apps use the kdbus interface, and hide the other stuff away or so... Lennart -- Lennart Poettering, Red Hat _______________________________________________ systemd-devel mailing list systemd-devel@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel
