2014-11-19 1:32 GMT+03:00 Lennart Poettering <lenn...@poettering.net>: > Yeah, that should just work already. LLMNR uses single-label names, > hence resolving the unqualified hostname of local link-local peers > should "just work" if resolved and nss-resolve are used. >
Thats fine. > Note that link-local ipv6 addresses for the name resolution stuff > aren't fun to use in Linux right now, as the glibc NSS eats up the > scopeid, when a client wants to resolve a hostname and specifies an > address family. THis has the effect that resolving to link-local IPv6 > addresses via "ssh" will just work (since ssh makes no restrictions on > the address family when resolving the hostname), but via "ping6" will > actually fail (since ping6 specifies AF_INET6 as address family...). Hm I need very specific use-case. I have eth0, eth1, dummy0 with ipv6 addresses in different nets and i need to assign hostname to dummy0 address, that can be reacheable via eth0 or eth1 =). Does this possible? -- Vasiliy Tolstov, e-mail: v.tols...@selfip.ru jabber: v...@selfip.ru _______________________________________________ systemd-devel mailing list systemd-devel@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel
