On 12/12/2014 02:57 PM, Matthias Urlichs wrote:
Hi,

Colin Guthrie:
What's the argument for including /usr/local in all this stuff? Feels
wrong to me.

+ME_TOO. /usr/local frequently has wider permissions than reasonable for
something that can affect system startup.

I can think of one argument in favor of this -- you can modify the system
default that way, without touching /etc, so this would add local
modifications to an image which you then use for system initialization.

However, you can do the same thing by adding appropriate *.conf files to
/usr/lib/systemd/**.


I'm jumping on this bandwagon of agreements as well.

Supporting this makes no sense...

JBG
_______________________________________________
systemd-devel mailing list
systemd-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel

Reply via email to