Hi, [BrigdeFDB] can be also fine. It's just that [BridgeFDB] makes you think at the entire forwarding database table and you are actually defining only one entry. [BridgeFDBEntry] makes you think at just one entry in that table.
/Alin -----Original Message----- From: systemd-devel [mailto:systemd-devel-boun...@lists.freedesktop.org] On Behalf Of Matthias Urlichs Sent: Friday, December 12, 2014 3:32 PM To: systemd-devel@lists.freedesktop.org Subject: Re: [systemd-devel] [PATCH] Add FDB support Hi, "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson": > After I explained it to them they said why not just call it [BridgeFDB] ... > +1 -- -- Matthias Urlichs _______________________________________________ systemd-devel mailing list systemd-devel@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel _______________________________________________ systemd-devel mailing list systemd-devel@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel
