2014-12-29 13:02 GMT+00:00 Martin Pitt <martin.p...@ubuntu.com>: > Mike Gilbert [2014-12-28 12:41 -0500]: >> From Lennart's commit message, it seems like this was done intentionally. > > The addition of libdir was certainly intentional, that's why I didn't > propose to just remove libdir. But it looks like this was just missing > to adjust the install location accordingly?
just my 2c: well, the addition of libdir was to be able to find the libdir for the "primary" arch (however you might define that), moving the pc file with this info to $libdir/pkgconfig makes that argument moot since you need to know libdir in order to know libdir. So if I can follow lennart correctly there are 2 possible ways: - have libdir in the pc file in /usr/share and make it to denote the "primary" arch (which is the current situation) - not have libdir in the pc file at all and still have the pc file in /usr/share (since libdir does not make sense if the file is in $libdir/pkgconfig, and it is the only reason why it might not belong in /usr/share) I have no preference between the 2, but moving the pc file to $libdir/pkgconfig just does not make sense. Greetings. Simon _______________________________________________ systemd-devel mailing list systemd-devel@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel
