In systemd-218, I have configured the following testcase:
/etc/systemd/network# ls -al
total 20
drwxr-xr-x 2 root root 4096 Jan 11 18:14 .
drwxr-xr-x 5 root root 4096 Jan 11 16:23 ..
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 96 Jan 11 18:14 99a-ether.link
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 241 Jan 11 18:12 brd0.network
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 56 Jan 11 18:12 brg0.netdev
# cat 99a-ether.link
[Match]
MACAddress=08:00:27:0a:c5:b2
[Link]
Description=ethernet_link
Alias=ether0
Name=ether0
# systemctl status -l systemd-networkd
● systemd-networkd.service - Network Service
Loaded: loaded (/usr/lib/systemd/system/systemd-networkd.service; enabled;
vendor preset: enabled)
Active: active (running) since Sun 2015-01-11 18:14:59 EST; 39s ago
Docs: man:systemd-networkd.service(8)
Main PID: 417 (systemd-network)
Status: "Processing requests..."
CGroup: /system.slice/systemd-networkd.service
└─417 /usr/lib/systemd/systemd-networkd
Jan 11 18:14:59 jng-sfac systemd-networkd[417]: brg0 : netdev ready
Jan 11 18:14:59 jng-sfac systemd[1]: Started Network Service.
Why would it be ignoring the link definition file for ether0?
If I invoke `rmmod e1000; modprobe e1000`, systemctl status has
one extra line to say:
Jan 11 18:17:52 jng-sfac systemd-networkd[417]: eth0 : renamed to
enp0s3
The L2 address is certainly correct:
2: enp0s3: <BROADCAST,MULTICAST> mtu 1500 qdisc noop state DOWN group
default qlen 1000
link/ether 08:00:27:0a:c5:b2 brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff
_______________________________________________
systemd-devel mailing list
systemd-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel
