On Tue, 03.02.15 09:05, Rauta, Alin (alin.ra...@intel.com) wrote:

> Yes, since the concept of UFD group is not exposed.

Does this mean we have agreement that the simply BindCarrier= option I
proposed would be sufficient for your usecases? That would be great!

Lennart

-- 
Lennart Poettering, Red Hat
_______________________________________________
systemd-devel mailing list
systemd-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel

Reply via email to