On Tue, Feb 3, 2015 at 5:08 PM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek <zbys...@in.waw.pl> wrote: > On Tue, Feb 03, 2015 at 06:49:21AM +0100, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: >> On Tue, Feb 03, 2015 at 02:42:36AM +0100, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: >> > On Mon, Feb 02, 2015 at 08:30:43AM +0100, Jan Synacek wrote: >> > > http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/systemd-devel/2014-December/026190.html >> > > >> > > I haven't got time to properly analyze the problem since then... >> > It sounded familiar ;) >> > >> > >> > On Mon, Feb 02, 2015 at 01:36:29PM +0200, Patrik Flykt wrote: >> > > "Operation not permitted" is what is printed for EPERM. But EPERM is not >> > > present in the client code itself, so I'm inclined towards a "permission >> > > problem" somewhere when running mock. >> > EPERM is also returned when using /dev/null in epoll_ctl_add. >> > I think I fixed it now. >> > >> > Which leads to a failure on arm in test-network: >> > FAIL: test-network >> > ================== >> > Assertion '!address_equal(a1, a2)' failed at >> > ../src/network/test-network.c:161, function test_address_equality(). >> > Aborting. >> > >> > I got out my chromebook to see what going on here. >> Ha, undefined behaviour on right shift. Gotta love C ;) >> >> So the tests pass in mock on all three primary arches. >> >> I'll let it spin on arm64 just to see what comes up. > And that passes too.
Great stuff! Thanks! -t _______________________________________________ systemd-devel mailing list systemd-devel@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel